ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Changes in glucose variability and diabetes control in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes on routine continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin therapy following a switch to hybrid closed-loop therapy (MiniMed 780G) – retrospective study
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Paediatrics, Diabetology, Endocrinology, and Nephrology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
2
Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
Submission date: 2024-06-13
Final revision date: 2024-07-29
Acceptance date: 2024-10-06
Online publication date: 2024-12-02
Corresponding author
Barbara Pernak
Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Mazowiecka 15, 92-215, Łódź, Poland
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) insulin delivery systems offer considerable benefits to individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in terms of glucose control and quality of life. With increasing numbers of regular users, real-life long-term data on long-term AHCL effectiveness become available.
Material and methods:
This was a single-centre retrospective study. We included children and young adults (age 5–25 years ) with established T1D (≥ 3 m) who started MiniMed780G therapy between January 2021 and April 2022. We excluded those naïve to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or insulin pumps, as well as those without good-quality baseline CGM data. Included patients were followed for 12 months, with CGM and pump data retrieved from 14-day periods before transition and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following the start of automode. Clinical data (body weight, height, glycated haemoglobin concentration) were recorded from the most recent outpatient visits.
Results:
Among 81 patients who started AHCL therapy, 46 met the criteria for analysis (mean age 11.5 ±4.4 years, diabetes duration 4.4 ±3.6 years, mean glycated haemoglobin 7.0 ±1.0%). Over the year following transition, we noted a significant improvement in time in target range 70–180 mg/dl (TIR, baseline: 69.1 ±12.0% to 12 m: 76.9 ±8.5%, p < 0.0001) and time in tight range 70–140 mg/dl (baseline: 45.3 ±14.2% to 12 m: 53.3 ±10.4%, p < 0.0001). Time below target range 70 mg/dl (TBR70 mg/dl) decreased significantly for 24-hour records (p = 0.0020). Importantly, those improvements were not accompanied by an increase in daily dose of insulin or body mass index.
Conclusions:
A prolonged 12-month-long observation in a routine care setting demonstrates that for young CGM- and pump users with T1D, switch AHCL offers sustained benefits in glucose variability.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Passanisi S, Lombardo F, Mameli C, et al. Safety, metabolic and psychological outcomes of medtronic MiniMed 780GTM in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Diabetes Ther 2024; 15: 343-365.
2.
Thomas Mres MG, Avari P, Godsland IF, et al. Optimizing type 1 diabetes after multiple daily injections and capillary blood monitoring: pump or sensor first? A meta-analysis using pooled differences in outcome measures Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23: 2521-2528.
3.
Effects of continuous glucose monitoring on metrics of glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: 1146-1156.
4.
Jiao X, Shen Y, Chen Y. Better TIR, HbA1c, and less hypoglycemia in closed-loop insulin system in patients with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2022; 10: e002633.
5.
Polish Diabetes Association. 2022 Guidelines on the management of patients with diabetes. A position of Diabetes Poland. Curr Top Diabetes 2022; 2: 1-130.
6.
Cordero TL, Dai Z, Arrieta A, et al. Glycemic outcomes during early use of the MiniMedTM 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop system with guardianTM 4 sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25: 652-658.
7.
Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care 2019; 42: 1593-1603.
8.
Pintaudi B, Gironi I, Nicosia R, et al. Minimed Medtronic 780G optimizes glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 32: 1719-1724.
9.
Elbarbary NS, Ismail EAR. MiniMed 780GTM advanced hybrid closed-loop system performance in Egyptian patients with type 1 diabetes across different age groups: evidence from real-world users. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2023; 15: 205.
10.
Silva J Da, Lepore G, Battelino T, et al. Real-world performance of the MiniMedTM 780G system: first report of outcomes from 4120 users. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24: 113-119.
11.
Arrieta A, Battelino T, Scaramuzza AE, et al. Comparison of MiniMed 780G system performance in users aged younger and older than 15 years: Evidence from 12 870 real-world users. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; 24: 1370-1379.
12.
Seget S, Jarosz-Chobot P, Ochab A, et al. Body mass index, basal insulin and glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes treated with the advanced hybrid closed loop system remain stable – 1-year prospective, observational, two-center study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13: 1036808.
13.
Polish Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes. The position of Diabetes Poland – 2024. Curr Top Diabetes 2023; 3: 1-348.
14.
Seget S, Chobot A, Rusak E, et al. MiniMed 780GTM in children with type 1 diabetes under seven years of age: Prospective open-label, single-arm, double-center, follow-up study. Technol Health Care 2023; 32: 1-10.
15.
Lepore G, Borella ND, Castagna G, et al. Advanced hybrid closed-loop system achieves and maintains recommended time in range levels for up to 2 years: predictors of best efficacy. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26: 49-58.
16.
Chrzanowski JD, Grabia S, Michalak A, et al. GlyCulator 3.0: a fast, easy-to-use analytical tool for CGM data analysis, aggregation, center benchmarking, and data sharing. Diabetes Care 2023; 46: e3-5.